Tex98
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2013
- Messages
- 308
- Reaction score
- 47
Only one of those cars was even made in the US.
H2: Indiana (by AM General)
Excursion: Kentucky
Aztek: Mexico
Prius: Japan
Only one of those cars was even made in the US.
Are you brain dead? People already live in these places. This isnt a theoretical concept. The fucking housing shortage is now, not just a prediction for projected influx. Low income people who live in large cities are being pushed out, often illegally. Jared Kushner's real estate company was just fucking accused for exposing children in his low income apartment/slums to cancer causing chemicals in efforts to push tenants out.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/busin...s-pushing-tenants-out-20180716-story,amp.html
it's just that easy!
Because it's bad for society. There have always been limitations and exclusions to property rights in this country. Do you think people who live near an interstate or airport expansion get full market value for their property when its taken by eminent domain? The vast harm done by exclusivising access to public resources far outweighs the cost of regulating the market of major rental property.That sucks and Kushner and that Trump gang blows but why shouldn't someone be able to get fair market value on a property they own? Legally of course, but if you can get double the rent for a property than what you are getting, you should be able to do it.
That sucks and Kushner and that Trump gang blows but why shouldn't someone be able to get fair market value on a property they own? Legally of course, but if you can get double the rent for a property than what you are getting, you should be able to do it.
Because it's bad for society. There have always been limitations and exclusions to property rights in this country. Do you think people who live near an interstate or airport expansion get full market value for their property when its taken by eminent domain? The vast harm done by exclusivising access to public resources far outweighs the cost of regulating the market of major rental property.
What’s “legally?” That’s after the fact. Kick out the poors, get double rent, maybe pay a fine later.
H2: Indiana (by AM General)
Excursion: Kentucky
Aztek: Mexico
Prius: Japan
Because it's bad for society. There have always been limitations and exclusions to property rights in this country. Do you think people who live near an interstate or airport expansion get full market value for their property when its taken by eminent domain? The vast harm done by exclusivising access to public resources far outweighs the cost of regulating the market of major rental property.
No clue. Not an attorney or property/rental lawyer. If the legal system isn't doing it's job to deter crap like that then the laws need to be changed, fines stiffened etc.
If I have a rental property in NYC, i'd assume there is a lease. At the end of the lease, I don't see why I would have to rent that property to someone who was already there for $1500 a month when I could get $3000 from someone else. I don't see how anyone can disagree with that.
Because it's bad for society. There have always been limitations and exclusions to property rights in this country. Do you think people who live near an interstate or airport expansion get full market value for their property when its taken by eminent domain? The vast harm done by exclusivising access to public resources far outweighs the cost of regulating the market of major rental property.
it's a commodity because we choose to let it be a commodity, that's a values statement, not an economic one; education could just as well be a commodity (and is in many cases), but we believe in public education. it used to be only for a certain class.
like healthcare, we can decide to continue to treat it like a commodity or we can decide that we're the wealthiest nation in the history of the world and maybe we can start shifting from a growth mindset to an equality mindset.
just because something has always been treated as a commodity doesn't mean it has to continue that way.
This is some pretty wild shit.it's a commodity because we choose to let it be a commodity, that's a values statement, not an economic one; education could just as well be a commodity (and is in many cases), but we believe in public education. it used to be only for a certain class.
like healthcare, we can decide to continue to treat it like a commodity or we can decide that we're the wealthiest nation in the history of the world and maybe we can start shifting from a growth mindset to an equality mindset.
just because something has always been treated as a commodity doesn't mean it has to continue that way.